Grappling With India’s National Biometric-Based Payments System
The bumpy road to scaling digital financial services with the Aadhaar Enabled Payment System
By Rahul Ranjan Sinha & Gaurav Chakraverty, Grameen Foundation India, May 2018
Rahul Ranjan Sinha is Associate Program Manager of Client Insights and Social Performance at Grameen Foundation India. Gaurav Chakraverty is Associate Director of Innovations in Digital Finance at Grameen Foundation India.
Woman conducting business on mobile phone, India. Photo credit: Chara Lata Sharma, 2017 CGAP Photo Contest.
India’s Aadhaar Enabled Payment System (AePS) is the world’s first national biometric-based payments system. In the two years since its launch, AePS has revealed both benefits and challenges as it seeks to expand financial inclusion. Grameen Foundation India has experienced these directly as we work to scale digital financial services and financial education.
How does AePS work?
AePS was designed to allow individuals to conduct financial transactions across any participating bank, using just three inputs:
A number identifying the bank;
The customer’s own national identification number, assigned using biometric data such as finger prints for identification; and
The customer’s fingerprint, which provides user authentication at the time of transaction.
Transactions can take place at a bank registered with the system, or at a Point of Sales (PoS) machine set up through bank “business correspondents” such as microfinance institutions (MFIs). This brings access, convenience and cost savings to rural customers who live far from a bank branch.
Grameen Foundation India’s experience with AePS
In a project funded by Citi Foundation, we incorporated AePS to help expand financial inclusion for poor and low-income women in the state of Uttar Pradesh. With our partners Sonata Finance, a leading Indian MFI, and Oxigen, a leading payment solution provider, the project reached out to women through 150 Sonata branches, where trained staff could assist clients in using the digitally-based PoS machines.
From March 2017 to November 2017, clients made more than 32,000 transactions worth USD 110,448 (INR 74 million) at Sonata branches. They made payments on individual or group loans from Sonata, deposits, and withdrawals. More than 58,600 women clients were trained on the AePS platform, and 15,760 made transactions.
An impact study of the project carved out some of the key advantages and challenges faced with AePS platform.
Key advantages for women clients:
High Trust – Most of the low-income women clients were illiterate; 76% of clients had completed no more than primary education. When visiting a bank on their own, these women were dependent on strangers for filling deposit or withdrawal forms. The AePS platform meant there were fewer forms to fill, and the women could be assisted by the trusted local branch staff. This became a big incentive for women to adopt digital financial services.
Convenience and Interoperability – Clients appreciated being able to make multiple transactions for different accounts at different banks under a single roof, saving time and travel expenses. Previously, clients living at distant locations often travelled as a group to do their banking, for reasons of both safety and friendship.
Ease of Transaction – Clients didn’t have to provide any document apart from their Aadhaar number. Previously, they needed bank passbooks and related documents, and just signing the documents could be intimidating.
No Transaction Fees – Unlike mobile wallets, AePS does not charge any service fees to the client. Mobile wallet fees could be as high as 1.5% to 2% of the transaction amount.
Key challenges for clients:
High Transaction Failure Rate – About 56% of the total transactions conducted during the project period failed, compared to a 60% failure rate for AePS nationally. This is astronomical by any standards. About 20% of the failed transactions were due to user issues, including incorrect Aadhaar numbers and insufficient bank balance. About 45% were due to technical glitches, including poor internet connectivity.
Biometric mismatch - About 35% of the failed transactions were due to biometric mismatch. Most women clients were engaged in jobs requiring rigorous manual labor, which resulted in eroded fingerprints that led to failed fingerprint recognition. This results in the exclusion of a large section of society, which is unable to reap the immense benefits of this platform.
Failed transaction causing balance deductions - In many cases, transactions failed to complete, but payment amounts were still deducted from clients’ accounts. Furthermore, it took roughly a month for the amount to be reposted. This is a major barrier, especially for low-income households whose small accounts had little margin for error.
Clearly, although benefits to the system were strong, operational challenges present severe limitations to the AePS system. Due to the regular failure of transactions, many clients expressed feeling discouraged from using the platform.
For AePS to deliver fully on its promise of expanding financial inclusion in India, these experiences point to the need for several crucial changes. AePS must reduce the number of failed transactions, and expedite the redress of failed transactions. To do so, three main issues must be addressed:
Finding a practical alternative to fingerprint authentication;
Continuing to strengthen the internet infrastructure in rural areas; and
Complimentary efforts to strengthen the digital and financial literacy of low-income women such that they enter the banking environment confident and well-prepared.
According to many in the impact investment industry, microfinance is dead - yesterday's solution at best. Fortunately for people at the bottom of the pyramid (BOP), no one told microfinance that it has died. But where is it going now and what do MFIs need to do to stay relevant?
Until now, reliable data on the financial lives of smallholder families has been scarce. Three new tools from CGAP, Insight2Impact, MIX and One Acre Fund shed light on this massive untapped market for financial services.
The uptake of digital remittances has been slower than hoped. Are we on the edge of a rapid revolution, or will the switch happen gradually, over many years? And is digital origination a key to driving down remittance costs?