| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Microleasing in Livelihood Restoration Following a Natural Disaster Helping the poor replace lost productive assets through microleasing This paper explores the role of microleasing in disaster recovery. Microleasing is now considered a viable option for quickly replacing productive assets lost by the poor in major disasters. In many ways, it can provide a win–win proposition to collateral-poor clients and liquidity-strapped financial institutions, as well as to donors and policy makers concerned about market distortions and creation of grant mentality. Leasing usually incurs lower transaction costs compared to collateral-based term loans. Emerging lessons from the field demonstrate that:
|
Journal Volume/Pages:
Publisher(s): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
About Us | Contact Us | Partners | Help | Site Map | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Manage Subscriptions © CGAP 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||